chysn wrote:I've totally given up on Behringer. It's not even on my radar, as I'm not sure they are even capable of producing a low-noise mixer.
The Mackie looks awesome, but my studio is minimal and always will be. I'm almost--almost--at a level where a Mackie 402VLZ would suffice, but that seems too ascetic. Almost. Huh...
dslsynth wrote: I have to stick with my Tapco Mix100 distortion unit.
chysn wrote:Um... I guess you always need to admire functional versatility in a piece of equipment.
dslsynth wrote:chysn wrote:Um... I guess you always need to admire functional versatility in a piece of equipment.
Maybe said expression is has just a little touch of humor? Its certainly not a Mackie and while its fine enough and not too bulky. And the sound quality? Well I mostly used it with recording via my computers microphone input so...! . o O ()
Razmo wrote:Tapco is in fact Mackie... it's a name they brand a series of cheaper mixers under as far as I've read...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TAPCO
Greg Mackie was the founder of Tapco... he's also the founder of Mackie
dslsynth wrote:Razmo wrote:Tapco is in fact Mackie... it's a name they brand a series of cheaper mixers under as far as I've read...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TAPCO
Greg Mackie was the founder of Tapco... he's also the founder of Mackie
Yeah I know. But maybe these designs had to have a different name for some strange reason!?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest